Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 785 (UTT)

GANESH GARIYA v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

CRLR/11/2025 · 2025-06-13

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS CRLR No.11 of 2025 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Naitik Bhatt, learned counsel i/b Mr. Ravi Sehgal, learned counsel for the revisionist. 2. Mr. S.S. Chauhan, learned Dy.A.G. for the State. 3. None for the private respondent. 4. It is contended by learned counsel for the revisionist that he wants to withdraw this revision for the reason that the parties to the revision have entered into compromise; they have taken mutual divorce; and there is chance of settlement with regard to proceedings pending between them. 5. Permission granted. 6. Revision is dismissed as withdrawn. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 13.06.2025 R.Dang