Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Tripura · body

2025 DAILYLAW 785 (TRI)

SRI SANJIT DEY AND ORS v. THE STATE OF TRIPURA

Crl.Petn./16/2025 · 2025-04-23

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA AGARTALA Crl. Petn. No.16 of 2025 1. Sri Sanjit Dey, son of Sri Santosh Dey, resident of Kathaltali, P.O. Dukli, P.S. Amtali, District-West Tripura. 2. Sri Sukanta Choudhury, son of late Arunmoy Choudhury, resident of Kalinagar, Belonia, P.S. Belonia, District-South Tripura. 3. Sri Tushan Banik, son of Sri Tulsi Banik, resident of village + P.O. Nehalchandranagar, Sub-division – Bishalgarh, P.S. Bishalgarh, District- Sepahijala, Tripura. ……… Petitioner(s). V E R S U S The State of Tripura. ……… Respondent(s). For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sankar Lodh, Advocate, Mr. Subham Majumder, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Raju Datta, Public Prosecutor, Mr. Rajib Saha, Addl. Public Prosecutor. HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. APARESH KUMAR SINGH Order 23/04/2025 The petitioner Nos.1 and 3 had lodged a complaint against petitioner No.2 under Sections 318, 115(2), 304(2) & 351 of BNS, 2023 bearing Amtali PS Case No.2025 AMT 022 on 03.03.2025. Petitioner No.2 was also arrested and later on released on bail by the learned trial Court. Petitioner Nos.1 and 3, along with petitioner No.2, have joined together to seek quashing of the FIR as they have reached a settlement. However, joining of the complainant and the accused to seek quashing of an FIR is not acceptable to the Court. Therefore, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the instant criminal petition with a liberty to file a fresh petition on behalf of the accused for quashing of the instant FIR and arraigning the informant as the respondent. Liberty is granted. Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (APARESH KUMAR SINGH), CJ Munna S MUNNA SAHA Digitally signed by MUNNA SAHA Date: 2025.04.24 15:59:53 +05'30'