IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.83 of 2025 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14783 of 2023 ====================================================== Chandan Kumar Son of Late Bhuneshwar Prasad Singh, Resident of Village- Khetalpura, P.S.- Asthawa, District- Nalanda. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar through Amrit Lal Meena Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2. District Magistrate cum Collector, Nalanda through DM Sri Shashank Shubhankar . 3. The Superintendent of Police,Shri Bharat Soni, Nalanda. 4. Circle Officer, Asthawan, Nalanda Ravindra Kumar Chaupal. 5. Shiv Shankar Prasad Singh S/o Late Shiv Balak Singh, R/o Village- Khetalpura, P.S.- Asthawa Sare, District- Nalanda. 6. Bipin Prasad Singh S/o Late Arjun Singh, R/o Village- Khetalpura, P.S.- Asthawa Sare, District- Nalanda. 7. Subodh Kumar S/o Sri Shatrughan Singh, R/o Village- Khetalpura, P.S.- Asthawa Sare, District- Nalanda. 8. Dhrub Narayan Singh S/o Late Sitaram Singh, R/o Village- Khetalpura, P.S.- Asthawa Sare, District- Nalanda. 9. Shailendra Singh S/o Late Suresh Singh, R/o Village- Khetalpura, P.S.- Asthawa Sare, District- Nalanda. 10. Lal Narayan Singh S/o Late Ram Prasad Singh, R/o Village- Khetalpura, P.S.- Asthawa Sare, District- Nalanda. 11. Virendra Singh S/o Late Jagdeo Singh, R/o Village- Khetalpura, P.S.- Asthawa Sare, District- Nalanda. 12. Rajiv Kumar Singh S/o Late Radhe Singh, R/o Village- Khetalpura, P.S.- Asthawa Sare, District- Nalanda. 13. Bhopal Singh S/o Late Naresh Singh, R/o Village- Khetalpura, P.S.- Asthawa Sare, District- Nalanda. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Gopal Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Additional Advocate General 12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 4 18-04-2025 Heard the parties. Patna High Court MJC No.83 of 2025(4) dt.18-04-2025 2/2 2. Learned counsel for the State has submitted that the order has been complied and this application has become infructuous. 3. The petitioner has also supported the same statement. 4. This application is dismissed as infructuous. Saif/- (Sandeep Kumar, J) U T