Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 78464 (ALL)

SMT. HEENA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/24157/2025 · 2025-08-17

Saurabh Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:140814 Court No. - 77 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 24157 of 2025 Petitioner :- Smt. Heena And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Suresh Kumar Maurya Counsel for Respondent :- Sandeep Kumar,C.S.C. Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 2. By way of the present writ petition, a direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere in peaceful marital life of petitioners, has been sought. 3. Although the time has already been extended in favour of learned Standing Counsel for seeking instructions but when the matter has been taken up today, no instructions has been received. 4. No useful purpose will be served by way of keeping the matter pending only at the behest of non-receiving the instructions, whereas learned Standing Counsel has submitted that as per the marksheet, submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners himself, the age of the alleged husband is only 19 years and as such the petitioner no. 2 has not attained the age of majority for solemnization of marriage. 5. In view of the above, no prayer can be exceeded at this stage, hence, the writ petition stands dismissed. Order Date :- 18.8.2025 #Vik/- Digitally signed by :- VIKRAM GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad