AJAY KUMAR PRAJAPATI v. STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS
WRIC/24212/2025 · 2025-07-24
Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 78461 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 78461 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:122981 Court No. - 34 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 24212 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ajay Kumar Prajapati Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anil Kumar Mishra,Manoj Kumar Tewari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayers:
"(I) Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus to direct the Respondent No. 3/ Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil Ballia Sadar, Ballia to decide the Suit No. 951 of 2025 (Computerized No. T202515090300951) between Ajay Kumar Prajapati Vs. Pushpa Devi under the provisions of section 35 (2) of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 pending in the court of Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil Ballia Sadar, Ballia, expeditiously within specific period and without granting further adjournment to any of the parties. (II) Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus to direct the Respondent Nos. 5 and 6 to not to interfere in the peaceful possession of the petitioner." It is contended that Case/Suit No.951 of 2018 (Computerized No.T202515090300951), under section- 35(2) of U.P. Revenue Code 2006 is pending consideration before respondent no.3- Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil Ballia Sadar, Ballia. The prayer made in the writ petition is to expedite the aforesaid case. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending or issuing notice to the private respondents, the writ petition is being disposed of, at the admission stage, without calling for counter affidavit, with a direction upon respondent no.3- Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil Ballia Sadar, Ballia to decide Case/Suit No.951 of 2018 (Computerized No.T202515090300951), under section- 35(2) of U.P. Revenue Code 2006, in accordance with law, after hearing all affected parties, preferably within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order. With the aforesaid direction, present writ petition stands disposed of. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the case on merit. Order Date :- 25.7.2025 SK Goswami Digitally signed by :- SHIVAKANT GOSWAMI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad