HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 12538 of 2024 Court No. - 46 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J. HON'BLE RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGA for the State and perused the record. 2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner has made a statement at the Bar that the instant writ petition has become infructuous and as such, he does not intend to further press this writ petition 3. In view of the statement made, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. September 10, 2025 Nadim Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anuj Kumar Gupta Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Rajiv Lochan Shukla,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Shane Alam .....Petitioner(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NADIM ALAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad