Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 78457 (BOM)

DILAWAR HAFIZ KHAN v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

APEAL/599/2019 · 2025-12-24

Shri R M Joshi

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

P2_APEAL_599_2019 WITH CONNECTED.DOC Prasad IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 599 OF 2019 Dilawar Hafiz Khan …Appellant Versus State of Maharashtra and Anr. …Respondents WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 926 OF 2021 Yasin Shakir Khan …Appellant Versus State of Maharashtra and Anr. …Respondents WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1277 OF 2019 Satish Chitbhal @Ramaasare Gupta …Appellant Versus State of Maharashtra …Respondent WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 989 OF 2021 Vijaypal Bakki Singh …Appellant Versus State of Maharashtra …Respondent Ms. Farhana Shah, for the Appellant. Mr. A.S. Gavai, APP for the Respondent - State. CORAM: R. M. JOSHI, J. DATED: 20th JANUARY, 2026. PC:- 1. Not on Board. Mentioned. Taken on Board for speaking to the minutes of the oral judgment dated 24th December, 2025. 20th January, 2026. P2_APEAL_599_2019 WITH CONNECTED.DOC 2. In the aforesaid oral judgment, in the cause title, appearance of “Ms. Farhana Shah, in Criminal Appeal No.989 of 2021, appointed Advocate for the Appellant” be shown. 3. In paragraph 2, the words “both Appeals” shall be replaced with the words “four Appeals”. After this substitution, paragraph 2 shall read as follows: “Since four Appeals involve similar question of facts and law, by consent of both sides Appeals are heard together and decided by this common judgment.” 4. The oral judgment dated 24th December 2025 be corrected and uploaded on the website. (R. M. JOSHI, J.) { 20th January, 2026.