Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 78436 (ALL)

RAM SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

NA529/2396/2025 · 2025-07-24

Nalin Kumar Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:122677 Court No. - 83 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 2396 of 2025 Applicant :- Ram Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Binod Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J. 1. This application under Section 529 BNSS has been filed with a prayer to direct the court concerned to decide the Criminal Revision No. 242 of 2024, under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act, P.S.- Vrindavan, District- Mathura arising out of complaint case no. 62 of 2014 pending in the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Court No.6, Mathura expeditiously within a stipulated period. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is the informant in the aforesaid case. It is further submitted that the matter related to under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act which was earlier dismissed by the trial Court and being aggrieved with the said order Criminal Revision No. 242 of 2024 was filed. It is further submitted that opposite party no.2/ accused is not appearing before the revisional Court causing unnecessary delay in the disposal of the said revision. The Court concerned is not taking proper interest to decide the said case. Applicant in this case has suffered monetary loss. The accused is not cooperating with the case. 4. I have considered the submissions and perused the entire record. 5. In the circumstances, the Court concerned is directed to take all possible measures to procure the presence of the accused / opposite party no. 2 by sending appropriate process to him within two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order before it and thereafter all endeavours shall be made by it for expeditious disposal of the case within the stipulated period of time provided in the Act itself, keeping in view the heavy work load in the said Court. 6. It is also made clear that the Court / Presiding Officer is not the only stake holder in the trial and disposal of a case, hence, besides the P.O. concerned, all the stake holders i.e. police and executive authorities, counsels, parties to the case, staff etc. are also made bound by this order and it will be their responsibility also to assist the Court in every manner for the expeditious disposal of this case. 7. With the above observations, the application stands disposed of. Order Date :- 25.7.2025//Fhd Digitally signed by :- FAHAD NIYAZ High Court of Judicature at Allahabad