Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 78435 (ALL)

KAILASH CHANDRA JOSHI v. VICE CHANCELLOR AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/10684/2025 · 2025-08-05

Mayur Jain Jt Registrar J Listing

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:132962 Court No. - 32 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 10684 of 2025 Petitioner :- Kailash Chandra Joshi Respondent :- Vice Chancellor And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ghanshyam Das Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- Shesh Kumar Srivastava Hon'ble Chandra Dhari Singh,J. 1. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking for the following reliefs:- "a). Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the release the post Retiral benefits to the petitioner with immediate effect from his retirement with compound interest. b) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondents to decide the representation of petitioner dated 05.06.2025 within stipulated period of time as directed by this Hon'ble Court." 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner without entering into the merits of the case made innocuous prayer that he may be permitted to file fresh representation before respondent no. 2 and a direction may be issued to him to decide the same in time bound manner. 3. Sri Dev Kaushik, holding brief of Sri Shesh Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel appearing on behalf respondent nos. 1, 2 and 3 vehemently opposed the petition on merit, but has not opposed the prayer as made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. 4. Heard Sri Ghanshyam Das Mishra, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Sri Dev Kaushik, holding brief of Sri Shesh Kumar Srivastava learned Counsel appearing on behalf of respondent nos. 1, 2 and 3 and perused the contents made in the writ petition. 5. Without entering into merits of the case, I am inclined to allow the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner as no objection made by learned counsel for the respondents. Petitioner is directed to file a fresh representation along with the present writ petition and certified copy of this order before respondent no 2 - Registrar, Sampurnanand Sanskrit University, Varanasi within 10 days. After receiving the said representation, the respondent no. 2 is directed to decide the said representation in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of the said representation. 6. With the aforesaid directions/observations, the present writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 6.8.2025 AKT (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad