- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31294 CRL.P No. 9958 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 9958 OF 2025 BETWEEN: 1. SRI M.G. CHENNAKESHAVA S/O M.H. GANGAIAH AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS R/AT MACHOHALLI COLONY DASANAPURA HOBLI BANGALORE - 560 091 2. SMT B. BYRAMMA W/O SRI. M.G. CHENNAKESHAVA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS R/AT MACHOHALLI COLONY DASANAPURA HOBLI BANGALORE - 560 091 3. SRI RAMACHANDRA M.G S/O M.H. GANGAIAH AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS R/AT MACHOHALLI COLONY DASANAPURA HOBLI BANGALORE - 560 091 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI: MANJUNATH M. HEGDE, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY MADANAYAKANAHALLI POLICE STATION REPRESENTED BY STATION HOUSE OFFICER AND STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT BUILDING, BENGALURU - 560 001. Digitally signed by NANDINI B G Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31294 CRL.P No. 9958 of 2025 2. SMT HONNAMMA W/O RAMACHANDRA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS R/AT KADABAGERE ROAD CHIKKAGOLLARAHATTI DASANAPURA HOBALI BENGALURU, NORTH TQ BENGALURU DISTRICT - 560091 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI: ANOOP KUMAR, HCGP FOR R1) THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 CR.PC (FILED U/S 528 BNNS) PRAYING TO QUASH THE COGNIZANCE ORDER DATED 28.02.2024 PASSED BY THE I ADDL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NELAMANGALA IN CC NO.2544/2024 FILED FOR OFFENCES UNDER SECTIONS 448, 323, 354, 504 AND 506 READ WITH SECTION 34 OF IPC AND TO QUASH THE CHARGE SHEET FILED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 POLICE IN CC NO.2544/2024 AGAINST THE PETITIONERS FOR THE OFFENCES UNDER SECTIONS 448, 323, 354, 504 AND 506 READ WITH SECTION 34 OF IPC PENDING BEFORE THE I ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NELAMANGALA. THIS CRIMINAL PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM ORAL ORDER Having argued the matter at length, when this Court is not inclined to grant any indulgence, petitioners' counsel sought - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31294 CRL.P No. 9958 of 2025 leave to withdraw the petition, with a liberty to file discharge application. Accordingly, the criminal petition is dismissed as withdrawn, reserving liberty to file discharge application. Sd/- (SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM) JUDGE *bgn/- CT:VS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 20