1 ( 2025:HHC:4167 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA CWP No.2883 of 2025 Decided on: 01.03.2025 Sanjeev Kumar ...…..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others …..Respondent. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No For the Petitioner: Mr. Goldy Kumar, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr.I.N.Mehta, Sr. Additional Advocate General, Mr. Navlesh Verma, Ms. Sharmila Patial, Additional Advocates General and Mr. Raj Negi, Deputy Advocate General. Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge ( Oral ) Learned counsel for the petitioner states that inadvertently instead of filing the petition on behalf of a juristic person i.e. M/s Chaitanyaa Enterprises, the present petition has been filed on behalf of one of its proprietors, therefore, he may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to file it afresh. 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment?Yes 2 ( 2025:HHC:4167 ) 2. Since the petition is at the threshold and prayer is innocuous, the instant petition is permitted to be withdrawn with liberty to file it afresh and disposed of as such so also the pending application(s), if any. (Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Judge (Sushil Kukreja) Judge 1st March, 2025. (yogesh/pankaj)