IN 209 Raseed State of Har CORAM: PRESENT: SANJAY V IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUN AT CHANDIG Versus of Haryana AM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SA ENT: None for the petitioner. Mr. Kanwar Sanjiv Kumar, AA AY VASHISTH, J. (Oral) # & !"#$%! #! !)* +$ ! "# $ % & ( ) ) ,&- ) - $ 1 ) & - F PUNJAB AND HARYANA NDIGARH CRM-M-40482-2024(O&M) Decided on :23.01.202 . . . Petition ersus . . . Responde E SANJAY VASHISTH ar, AAG, Haryana. **** & ! " $# "&#$' - &' , $ 210 & $ ' # & $ '"#() * . ! " $#/0- & - )- M) 01.2025 etitioner pondent #$ ( # *+ - RASHMI 2025.01.24 14:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-40 3. Learn 22.08.2024, not come fo 40482-2024(O&M) & & 0 ) ) & 1 ( & ( - 1!!52 ) * ) -- / & ) - 2&) - ) ) & & &&- - * - - 7 ) - & * 5 + ) "'9 :(#(; Learned State counsel submits that .2024, the petitioner was required to me forward to join the investigation. - 2 - &3& 4& $ & ) ! " # $ & $ ' # - & - - & ) * ) - ) &- - - &- - - ) & - ) ) / - 2& '6 ! 1 &+ & 8 % ) ) & 8 & $ s that in pursuance to the order date ed to join the investigation, but he ha tion. Learned State counsel furth # & & ) - - & er dated t he has further RASHMI 2025.01.24 14:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-40 submits tha did not hav passed in th officer abou the petition present peti account of t Learn who arreste interim ord submits tha concerned i but no such already pass 4. counsel and concerned I be incorrec having beco January 2 Rashmi Whether spea Whether Repo 40482-2024(O&M) its that the petitioner was involved in ot have any idea/knowledge of the d in the present petition, therefore, he r about the same. Thus, on the basis o etitioner was effected in the present nt petition be disposed of as havin nt of the fact that the petitioner has alr Learned State counsel on instruction arrested the accused submits that, he m order, therefore, the petitioner has its that had there been any inclinati rned investigating officer could have o such step was taken by the petiti y passed from 22.08.2024 to his arrest I have considered the explana el and there is no need to proceed to rned Investigating officer, until the su correct. In view of the above, the p g become infructuous. 23, 2025 speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Reportable: Yes/No - 3 - ved in other criminal cases also and the interim order dated 22.08.202 re, he never apprised the Investigatin asis of the production warrant, arrest o esent case on 12.12.2024. Resultantl having been rendered infructuous o has already been arrested. ructions from the Investigating office hat, he was never made aware of th er has already been arrested. He als clination to join the investigation have been apprised by the petitione petitioner as four months period ha arrest. xplanation given by the learned Sta ed to call for any explanation from th the submissions are factually found the present petition is disposed of a (SANJAY VASHISTH JUDGE and he 08.2024 tigating arrest of ultantly, ous on officer, of the also the titioner, iod had ed State rom the ound to d of as ISTH) RASHMI 2025.01.24 14:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document