Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:42859 CRP No. 777 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 777 OF 2025 BETWEEN:
1. SRI RAJU N GOWDA S/O LATE SRI. NANJAPPA K. GOWDA AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/AT NO. 144, PREMALAYA 7TH CROSS, ANJANADRI LAYOUT, SHETTY HALLI, JALAHALLI WEST, BENGALURU - 560015 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. VASUDEVAMURTHY N.S., ADVOCATE) AND:
1. SRI MANJUNATH N GOWDA S/O LATE SRI. NANJAPPA K. GOWDA AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, R/AT NO. 144, PREMALAYA 7TH CROSS, ANJANADRI LAYOUT, SHETTY HALLI, JALAHALLI WEST, BENGALURU - 560 015. 2. SMT. ROOPA GOWDA W/O SRI. CHIDAMBARA NAGARAJA D/O LATE SRI. NANJAPPA K. GOWDA AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS R/AT E2-702 REVELL ORCHID SOCIETY PORWAL ROAD LOHEGAON PUNE - 411 047 Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:42859 CRP No. 777 of 2025
3. SMT. PREMA N. GOWDA W/O LATE SRI. NANJAPPA K. GOWDA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS R/AT NO. 144, PREMALAYA 7TH CROSS, ANJANADRI LAYOUT SHETTY HALLI, JALAHALLI WEST BENGALURU - 560 015 …RESPONDENTS
THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 115 OF CPC, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 21.07.2025 PASSED ON I.A.NO.14 IN OS.NO.3334/2021 ON THE FILE OF THE XLII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BANGALORE, REJECTING THE IA.NO. 14 FILED UNDER SEC. 151 OF CPC FOR SEEKING DIRECTION TO THE PLAINTIFF NO. 1 TO SURRENDER SEALED COVER CONTAINING SUIT SUMMONS TO THE DEFENDANT. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER
1. Defendant is the revision petitioner challenging the Order dated 21.07.2025 dismissing the I.A. No.14 in OS No.3334/2021. 2. I.A. No.14 is filed seeking a direction to the plaintiff to surrender the sealed cover containing the suit summons in the name of defendant. - 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:42859 CRP No. 777 of 2025
3. The learned Trial judge has dismissed the said application on the ground that defendant has already appeared through the advocate and contesting the case and therefore I.A.No.14 is only meant to protract the proceedings. 4. Said order is challenged in this Revision Petition. 5. Said order is not a revisable order as is contemplated under Section 115 Code of the Civil Procedure. 6.
Accordingly, Revision Petition stands dismissed as not maintainable. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE SNC List No.: 2 Sl No.: 20 ct:SG