Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 78419 (MAD)

P.RAHIM v. THE COMMISSIONER OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION

WP/26569/2025 · 2025-07-25

N Mala

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 26569 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 25-07-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE N. MALA WP No. 26569 of 2025 P.Rahim S/o.Hamsa, No.11/365, Pathari House, Chungam, Cherampadi, Pandalur, Nilgiris. Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Commissioner Of Municipal Administration, Ezhilagam, Chepauk, Chennai-600 005. 2.The Regional Directorate Of Municipal Administration Kumarnathapuram, Marudhasalapuram, Main Road, Tiruppur-641 603. 3.The Commissioner Nelliyallam Municipality-Pandalur, Pandalur Taluk, The Nilgiris. Respondent(s) Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, pleased to issue Writ of Mandamus, directing the 3 rd respondent to open the financial /price bid in respect of Tender ID(NLG24MUN191)as per the tender notice dated 08.04.2025 Online Tender ID 2025_MAWS_548061_1(Tender Ref No.SADP 2024-2025 )for the work titled “Providing Interlocking Paver Block to Pannikolly UPHC in Nelliyalam Municipality”, and consequently issue the work order to the 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 26569 of 2025 successful bidder without any further delay, within a time frame as may be fixed by this Hon'ble Court. For Petitioner(s): M/s.Meiyappan Mohan For Respondent(s): Mr.M.S.Prem Kumar, GA ORDER The above writ petition is filed for a writ of mandamus, directing the 3 rd respondent to open the financial /price bid in respect of Tender ID(NLG24MUN191), as per the tender notice dated 08.04.2025, and issue work order to the successful bidder within the time frame. 2. Mr.M.S.Premkumar, learned Government Advocate takes notice for the respondents. 3. Heard both sides. 4. When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate submitted that financial bid was opened yesterday and as the bids were 25% below the permitted value, the respondents decided to go for fresh tender. 5. The submission of the learned Government Advocate is Recording. In view of the submission of the learned Government Advocate, nothing survives for further adjudication in the writ petition. Hence, writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. However, there shall be no order as to costs. dsn 25-07-2025 (1/4) Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 26569 of 2025 To 1.The Commissioner of Municipal Administration, Ezhilagam, Chepauk, Chennai-600 005. 2.The Regional Directorate of Municipal Administration, Kumarnathapuram, Marudhasalapuram, Main Road, Tiruppur-641 603. 3.The Commissioner, Nelliyallam Municipality-pandalur, Pandalur Taluk, The Nilgiris. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 26569 of 2025 N.MALA J. dsn WP No. 26569 of 2025 25-07-2025 (1/4) 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis