Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:122276 Court No. - 32 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 10412 of 2025 Petitioner :- Smt Geeta Sharma Respondent :- State Of Up And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Alka Srivastava,Pranab Kumar Ganguli Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Chandra Dhari Singh,J.
1. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking the following main prayer:-
"a). Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing/commanding the respondent nos. 2 and 3 to take appropriate decision regarding the payment of salary to the petitioner within stipulated time pursuant to the letter dated 06.06.2019 sent by the District Inspector of Schools, Baghpat in compliance of order dated 05.01.2018 passed by this Hon'ble Court in Writ-A No.22334 of 2013. b). Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing/commanding the respondent no.3, District Inspector of Schools, Baghpat to pay the arrears of salary to the petitioner w.e.f. 05.09.2012 up till date and continue to pay month to month salary as and when it falls due in view of the decision of Full Bench rendered in the case of Santosh Kumar Singh Versus State of U.P. and Others, "Special Appeal (D) No.215 of 2015 [2015 (7) ADJ 179]."
2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner without entering into merits of the case, made an innocuous prayer that the petitioner may be permitted to file a fresh representation before respondent no.3 and a direction may be issued to him to decide the same in time bound manner. 3. Learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State- respondents vehemently opposed the writ petition on merits, but has not opposed the innocuous prayer as made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. 4. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, Sri
D.P. Singh, learned Standing Counsel appeared on advance accepted notice on behalf of the State-respondents, perused the contents made in the writ petition and the documents on record. 5. Without entering into merits of the case, I am inclined to allow the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner as no objection made on behalf of learned Standing counsel appearing on behalf of State-respondents.
Petitioner is directed to file a fresh representation along with present writ petition as well as certified copy of this order before respondent no.3, District Inspector of Schools, Baghpat within 10 days from the date of production of certified copy of this order. After receiving the said representation, respondent no.3 is directed to decide the said representation in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date of receiving of the said representation. 6. With the aforesaid directions/observations, the present writ petition is disposed of. . (Chandra Dhari Singh, J.) Order Date :- 25.7.2025 Atul Digitally signed by :- ATUL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad