Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7840 (AP)

M. Shaul Hameed, v. The Andhra Pradesh State Waqf Board,

WP/15316/2017 · 2025-04-10

Subba Reddy Satti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010082072017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] THURSDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 15316/2017 Between: M. Shaul Hameed, ...PETITIONER AND The Andhra Pradesh State Waqf Board and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. MOHD ISLAMUDDIN ANSARI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. MOHAMMED GAYASUDDIN The Court made the following: ORDER Heard Sri S.Rajamouli, learned counsel representing Sri Md.Islamuddin Ansari, learned counsel for petitioner and Sri Sk.Khaja Basha, learned standing counsel for respondents 1 to 3. 2. The above writ petition is filed to declare the action of 1st respondent in not accepting the rent in respect of shop bearing Door No.40/317, Shop No.S1, Mohammadia Waqf Complex, Kurnool by considering the representation dated 01.12.2016 and the action of 3rd respondent in not providing facilities as per the licence agreement dated 07.07.2014, as illegal and arbitrary. 3. Learned standing counsel for respondents 1 to 3 would submit that pending the writ petition, the lease was renewed in favour of the petitioner in respect of same shop for a period of one year. He would also submit that by afflux of time, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. 4. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is Closed. No costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI PVD