Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 78399 (BOM)

RATHINA MARAVARMAN v. UNION OF INDIA THR ITS SECRETARY MINISTRY OF LAW NAD JUSTICE AND ORS

PIL/126/2025 · 2025-12-19

Shri Gautam A Ankhad

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

BDP 909-PIL-126-2025.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 126 OF 2025 Rathina Maravarman …. Petitioner. V/s Union of India and Ors. …. Respondents. Ms. Rathina Maravarman, the petitioner in-person, present. Mr. Ashutosh Mishra a/w Mr. D.P. Singh, Mr. Anil Kumar Singh, Ms. Shazia Ansari, advocates for the respondent no.1-UOI. Ms. Neha S. Bhide with Mr. O.A. Chandurkar, Addl. G.P., Mrs Pooja Patil, AGP for the respondent no.2. Ms. Rebecca Gonsalvez, advocate for the respondent no.3. Mr Prasad L. Gajbhiye, advocate for the respondent no.4. Mr. Yogendra Rajgor,advocate for the respondent no.5. Ms. Anita Catellino i/b Ms. Kinjal Shah, advocates for the respondent no.6. CORAM : SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR, CJ & GAUTAM A. ANKHAD, J. DATE : 19th DECEMBER 2025. P.C. : In view of the defects in this petition which would require quite a number of amendments, Ms. Rathina Maravarman, the petitioner in-person, seeks permission to withdraw this petition with liberty to file a fresh petition with sufficient averments supported by necessary documents. Permission granted. 2. Public Interest Litigation No.126 of 2025 is disposed of as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. [GAUTAM A. ANKHAD, J.] [CHIEF JUSTICE] 1 BHARAT DASHARATH PANDIT Digitally signed by BHARAT DASHARATH PANDIT Date: 2025.12.25 11:57:57 +0530