112 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH *** CR-4416-2025 Date of decision : 25.07.2025 Parshotam Lal ... Petitioner Versus Sanatam Dharam Mahavir Dal (Regd.) ... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL Present: Mr.Manuj Nagrath, Advocate for the petitioner. VIKAS BAHL, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the order dated 26.05.2025 passed by the Additional District Judge, Ludhiana (Annexure P-14) upholding the order dated 11.03.2014 (Annexure P-12) passed by the Civil Judge (Sr.Div.), Ludhiana, vide which the application filed under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC has been dismissed in default and the application for restoration has been dismissed. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that inadvertently the order dated 11.03.2014 as well as 10.09.2003 have not been challenged in the present petition and thus seeks to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file a fresh petition after laying challenge to the said orders. 3. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. (VIKAS BAHL) JUDGE July 25, 2025. Davinder Kumar Whether speaking / reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No Davinder Kumar 2025.07.28 11:16 I attest the accuracy and authenticity of this order / judgment