Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7839 (BOM)

SURAIYYA BEGUM ASGAR ALI v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

WP/1673/2016 · 2025-07-29

Shri Neeraj P Dhote, Shri R G Avachat

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

923-WP-1673-2016.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 923 WRIT PETITION NO. 1673 OF 2016 Suraiyya Begum Asgar Ali ….Petitioner VERSUS The State of Maharashtra and others …..Respondents ….. Mr. Vinayak Dahihande h/f Mr. Ajeet B. Kale, Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. A. A. A. Khan, AGP for the Respondents – State Mr. Girish V. Wani, Advocate for Respondent No.4 ….. CORAM : R. G. AVACHAT & NEERAJ P. DHOTE, JJ. DATE : 29.07.2025 PER COURT : 1. The land of the Petitioner has been taken over for the construction of new road. No acquisition proceedings have been initiated, nor the Petitioner has been paid any amount for having been dispossessed of the land. 2. We, therefore, direct the Respondents – Authority to initiate the proceedings for acquisition of the Petitioner’s land and pass the award in terms of provisions of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. If the proceedings are not concluded within the time frame given under the statute, the concerned authority would be directed to deposit a hefty amount with this Court towards the compensation to be paid to the Petitioner. 3. Writ Petition stands disposed of accordingly. [NEERAJ P. DHOTE, J.] [R. G. AVACHAT, J.] Sameer/July-2025 1 2025:BHC-AUG:20019-DB