Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 78371 (ALL)

NARAYAN LAL GURJAR v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WTAX/3486/2025 · 2025-09-17

Prashant Bilgaiyan Registrar J Criminal, Shekhar B Saraf

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT TAX No. - 3486 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE PRAVEEN KUMAR GIRI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The present impugned order is appealable under the statute there being an alternative efficacious remedy. 3. This Court does not deem it fit to interfere in the matter at this stage. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty granted to the petitioner to file an appeal, in accordance with law. If such an appeal is filed within a period of three weeks from date, the authority concerned is directed to grant an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and, thereafter, pass a reasoned order within a period of eight weeks from the date of filing of the said appeal. September 18, 2025 K.K. Maurya Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kundan Kumar, Nafis Ahmad Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Praveen Kumar Giri,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Narayan Lal Gurjar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- KAMLESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad