RAJKISHOR ALIAS CHIRAGAN v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
BAIL/27379/2024 · 2025-05-19
Siddharth
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 78357 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 78357 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:84432 Reserved on 15.5.2025 Delivered on 20.5.2025 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 27379 of 2024 Applicant :- Rajkishor Alias Chiragan Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Chandra Kant Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Sakshi Srivastava,Shiv Kumar Pal Hon'ble Siddharth,J. Heard Sri Chandra Kant Tripathi, learned counsel for the applicant; Ms. Sakshi Srivastava, learned counsel for the informant and the learned A.G.A. for the State. The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant, Rajkishor Alias Chiragan , with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No. 176 of 2024, under Section- 376AB, 504,506, 323 I.P.C., and section 5/6 POCSO Act Police Station - Dhanghata, District - Sant kabir Nagar. There are allegations against the applicant of committing offence of rape, criminal intimidation and causing hurt to victim besides committing the offence under section 5/6 POSCO Act.
Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that it is a case of false implication of the applicant. Victim is major and not minor.There is no other evidence against the applicant except allegations on record. Learned A.G.A has vehemently opposed the submission of learned counsel for the applicant. After hearing the rival contentions this court finds that victim has consistently made allegations against the applicant. Victim is minor aged about 12 years only and no reason has been assigned by
learned counsel for the applicant as to why she has falsely implicated the applicant. This Court after hearing the learned counsels for the parties does not finds any ground for enlarging
the applicant on bail at this stage. The bail application is accordingly, rejected. The trial court is directed to conclude the trial against the applicant as expeditiously as possible, as per section 309 Cr.P.C.(New Section 346 B.N.S.S.)
Order Date :- 20.5.2025 Atul kr. sri. Digitally signed by :- ATUL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad