IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-2806-2024(O&M) Date of decision: 24.09.2025 Ram Karan (now deceased) through its LR … Petitioner Versus Sonam Chaudhary … Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL Present: Mr. Surinder Jaipal, Advocate, for Mr. Supinder Singh Sohi, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Shiny Chopra, AAG, Punjab. *** VIKRAM AGGARWAL, J. (ORAL) At the outset, learned counsel for petitioner submits that in view of the speaking order dated 18.09.2024 passed by the respondent-authority, the petitioner does not wish to press the instant contempt petition, at this stage. He further submits that the petitioner shall, if so advised, avail all such other remedies as shall be admissible in law against the said order. 2. In view of the statement given by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present contempt petition is disposed of as having not been pressed. 3. Rule is discharged. 4. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. ( Vikram Aggarwal ) Judge September 24, 2025 Rajan Whether speaking / reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No RAJAN KUMAR 2025.09.25 11:26 I am approving this document