Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7835 (JHR)

DINESH MANDAL ALIAS KULDEEP MANDAL v. THE STATE OF JHARKHADN

A.B.A./1684/2025 · 2025-03-12

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.1684 of 2025 ------ Dinesh Mandal @ Kuldeep Mandal, age about 20 Years, Son of Katilal Mandal, Resident of Village- Ghosko, P.O- Budhudih, P.S. Ahilyapur, District- Giridih. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Kaushal Kishor Mishra, Advocate For the State : Mr. Shailendra Kr. Tiwari, Spl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated-12-03-2025 Heard the parties. Apprehending his arrest in connection with Ahilyapur P.S. Case No.47 of 2023 instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 411/414/419/420/467/468/ 471/120(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 66(B)/66(C)/66(D) of the Information Technology Act, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in committing cyber-crime and duped money from innocent account holders of banks and transferred the same to fake bank accounts. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been implicated in this case only due to village politics. It is also submitted that there is no money trail, to implicate the petitioner in this case. It is further submitted that co-accused persons, with similar allegations, have already been given the privileges of anticipatory bail by this court vide orders dated 24.02.2025 passed in A.B.A. No.3711 of 2024 and 18.02.2025 passed in A.B.A. No.3860 of 2024. It is lastly submitted that petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the investigation of the case and to furnish sufficient security including cash security. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be given the privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned Spl.P.P. appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner. Considering the submissions of learned counsels and the facts and circumstances stated above, I am inclined to grant privileges of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within six weeks from the date of the order and in the event of his arrest or surrendering, he will be enlarged on bail on depositing Rs.20,000/- as cash security and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II- cum-Spl. Judge (Cyber Crime), Giridih in connection with Ahilyapur P.S. Case No.47 of 2023 with the condition that he will co-operate with the investigation of the case and appear before the investigating officer as and when noticed by him and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the pendency of the case and further conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Saroj/