IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.70546 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-153 Year-2024 Thana- ARERAJ District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1. Satendra singh Son of Bachha singh Resident of village siswa rambaran sah Ka Tola, P.S.- Areraj, District- East Champaran. 2. Krishnadeo Singh @ Jaikishun Singh Son of Late Tika Singh Resident of village siswa rambaran sah Ka Tola, P.S.- Areraj, District- East Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Ashok Singh Son of Late Ambika Singh Resident of village siswa rambaran sah Ka Tola, P.S.- Areraj, District- East Champaran. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Harsha Shashwat, Adv For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Madan Kumar, Adv ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA ORAL ORDER 2 08-10-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioners are in custody in connection with Areraj P.S Case No. 153 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 61(2), 3(5) of BNS. 3. As per allegation in the FIR, petitioners along with other co-accused persons had conspired against the informant and deliberately and fraudulently committed a terrible fraud in the law suit and property of the informant. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.70546 of 2025(2) dt.08-10-2025 2/3 petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. The fact of the matter is that co-accused Bachcha Singh is the own nephew of the Tika Singh and the petitioner no. 2 namely, Krishadeo Singh @ Jaikishun Singh is that son of Tika Singh and from this it is clear that informant and the petitioners belong to same family. He further submits that petitioners have equal share in entire property and Bachcha Singh has transferred his own share of land to the petitioner no. 1, Satendra Singh and others and petitioner no. 2 is said to be the identifier. He further submits that this is a matter of land dispute and simply invoking jurisdiction of the Criminal Court should not be permitted to be used as a weapon to pressurize the petitioners. He further submits that petitioner are in custody since 01.07.2025. Petitioner No. 1 possesses two antecedent whereas Petitioner No. 2 possesses five antecedent. 5. However, learned APP for the State oppose the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner. 6. On perusal of the FIR and impugned order dated 22.08.2025, it appears that dispute is Prima Facie civil in nature. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and its nature, let the above named petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.70546 of 2025(2) dt.08-10-2025 3/3 with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-5th, East Champaran, Motihari in connection with Areraj P.S. Case No. 153 of 2024. Sunnykr/- (Ramesh Chand Malviya, J) U