Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 78330 (KAR)

SRI ANGADI NARAYANAPPA v. SRI MANJUNATHA C GOWDA

MFA/4738/2024 · 2025-09-13

Lok Adalath

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BENGALURU BEFORE THE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 CONCILIATORS PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI & MR.H.PAVANA CHANDRA SHETTY., MEMBER M.F.A.No.4738/2024 (Lok Adalat No.5927/2025) BETWEEN SRI.ANGADI NARAYANAPPA, S/O G.B.NARAYANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, R/AT YALAKUNDLI, SHUNTIKOPPA VILLAGE, SAGARA TALUK, SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT-578 201. ...APPELLANT (BY SRI. PRUTHVI WODEYAR, ADVOCATE) AND 1 . SRI MANJUNATHA C GOWDA, S/O CHANDRASHEKARA, AGED ABOUT 43 YERAS, R/AT GUNDANAPURA POST, SIRSI TALUK-581 401. DRIVER OF THE VEHICLE BEARING NO.KA-31/A-1044. D.L NO. KA-31 20080000639, VALID FROM 23-06-2008 TILL 31-08-2030 2 2 . SRI CHANDRASHEKARA GOWDA, S/O NAGAPPA GOWDA, AGED ABOUT NOT KNOWN R/AT : KANTARGI POST, GUNDANAPURU, SRISI TALUK-581401, OWNER OF PICKUP VEHICLE, BEARING KA-31/A-1044. 3. THE MANAGER, ROYAL SUNDARAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., BRANCH, 3RD FLOOR, AVURA D PALACE, KULLURU FERY ROAD, CHILIMBI URVA, MANAGALURU-574 142. POLICE NO. VCG 0463813000104, VALID FROM 15-06-2021 TILL 14-06-2022. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.B.PRADEEP, ADVOCATE ) THIS MFA IS FILED U/S.173(1) OF MV ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 16.03.2024 PASSED IN MVC NO.830/2022 ON THE FILE OF THE V ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND ADDITIONAL MACT, SHIVAMOGGA, SITTING AT SAGAR, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED: 3 CONCILIATION ORDER Learned Counsel appearing for the Appellant - Claimant is present. The learned Counsel appearing for Respondent No.3 – Insurance Company along with its representative are present. 2. After prolonged negotiations, the matter is settled. A joint memo signed by the learned advocate appearing for the appellant/claimant (being authorized by the appellant/claimant to sign) and the learned advocate appearing for respondent No.3- Insurance Company and its authorized officer is filed. The appellant-claimant has agreed to receive and respondent No.3- Insurance Company has agreed to pay a lump-sum of Rs.2,25,000/- (Rupees Two Lakhs Twenty Five Thousand Only), in addition to what has been awarded by the Tribunal, in full and final settlement of the claim. 3. Respondent No.3 - Insurance Company has agreed to deposit the said amount before the Tribunal within six weeks from the date of preparation of award, failing which the said 4 amount shall carry interest at the rate of 9% P.A. from the date of default, till the date of deposit. 4. The entire enhanced compensation amount shall be released in favour of the appellant/claimant, on proper identification. 5. This Miscellaneous First Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the Joint memo. The Judgment and Award of the Tribunal shall stand modified accordingly. 6. The office shall accordingly prepare the award and shall ensure that the award made today is communicated to the Tribunal for appropriate action. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- MEMBER BVK