Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 78324 (ALL)

MOHIT VERMA v. STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

WRIA/10391/2025 · 2025-08-10

Manju Rani Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:135686 Court No. - 52 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 10391 of 2025 Petitioner :- Mohit Verma Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Krishna Kumar,Soumyesh Dutt Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Gaurav Bishan Hon'ble Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J. Learned counsel for respondent-BSA has submitted instructions in Court today, which is kept on record. Office is directed to register the same. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Gaurav Bishan, learned counsel for respondent-BSA and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. The writ petition has been filed with the prayer to direct the respondents to provide leave encashment and group insurance to the petitioner on behalf of his deceased mother as its being paid to the employees of State Government. It is further prayed to decide the representation of the petitioner moved on 16.06.2025 within the time as fixed by this Court. On the basis of instructions, learned counsel for respondent-BSA submits that group insurance has already been paid to the petitioner on 27.06.2025, which is not being denied by learned counsel for the petitioner, however, regarding leave encashment, on the basis of instructions, he submits that petitioner is not entitled for the same. Learned counsel for the respondent-BSA submits that in case, fresh representation is given by the petitioner before the authority concerned for payment of leave encashment, the same shall be decided in accordance with law. Considering the facts and circumstance of the case but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case set up on behalf of the petitioner, the present writ petition is disposed of by providing that petitioner may make fresh application/representation, ventilating all his grievances, supported by such documents, as may be advised, before the respondent no.5 District Basic Education Officer, District- Hathras, within two weeks from today along with a certified copy of this order. On such representation being made, respondent no.5 shall make all endeavours to consider and decide the same, strictly in accordance with law, by means of a reasoned and speaking order, after giving proper opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order, if there is no legal impediment. Order Date :- 11.8.2025 Rahul. Digitally signed by :- RAHUL GOSWAMI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- RAHUL GOSWAMI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad