Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7832 (CAL)

SOUMENDRA RAY v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS

WPA/1339/2020 · 2025-03-11

Ananya Bandyopadhyay

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

11.03.2025 Ct. No.33 Sl. No.52 cm WPA 1339 of 2020 Soumendra Ray Vs. Union of India & Ors. Mr. K.B.S. Mahapatra Mr. Aditya Shit … for the petitioner Mr. Anirban Mitra … for the respondents/ Union of India The learned advocate representing the petitioner submits that the petitioner despite being contacted on several occasions expressed his un-willingness to proceed with the hearing of the instant writ petition. However, his client refused to issue any written instruction to that effect. The learned advocate representing the respondents/Union of India is present. Considering the submissions of the learned advocate representing the petitioner, let the matter be dismissed for non prosecution. (Ananya Bandyopadhyay, J.)