Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7831 (HP)

BISHAN DASS AND OTHERS v. THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS

CWP/4292/2025 · 2025-05-13

Jyotsna Rewal Dua

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP Nos.4292 & 4294 of 2025 Date of decision: 13.05.2025 1. CWP No.4292 of 2025 Bishan Dass & Ors. ...Petitioners. Versus State of HP and Ors. ...Respondents. 2. CWP No.4294 of 2025 Mohan Lal Sharma & Ors. ...Petitioners. Versus State of HP and Ors. ...Respondents. Coram: Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioners : Mr. Shivom Vashista, Advocate. For the respondent(s) : Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, Additional Advocate General. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice. Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. These writ petitions have been filed for the grant of almost identical reliefs. The substantive reliefs in CWP No.4292 of 2025 read as under:- -2- “(I) That the respondents may kindly be directed to grant the benefit of Assured Career Progression Scheme in favour of the petitioner by ignoring the effect of enhancement allowed on account of implementation of 5th CPC and the pay of the petitioner may kindly be further ordered to be fixed accordingly in 6th CPC from the due date along with arrears and interest, in the interest of justice.” 3. Admittedly, the petitioners have invoked extra ordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India without even preferring any representation to the competent authority for the redresssal of their grievances raised in the writ petition. 4. Confronted with above, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners would be preferring representation within two weeks from today. In case, such representation is so preferred, the competent authority shall consider and decide the same, in accordance with law, within further period of six weeks. The order so passed shall also be communicated to the petitioners. These writ petitions stand disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. Jyotsna Rewal Dua 13th May, 2025 Judge (Pardeep)