HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 26446 of 2025 Court No. - 92 HON'BLE RAM MANOHAR NARAYAN MISHRA, J. 1. Supplementary affidavit filed by the applicants is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned counsel for the respondent No.2 and learned A.G.A. for the State of U.P. and perused the material available record. 3. The instant application under section 582 BNSS has been filed seeking quashing of the entire proceedings of S.T. No.360 of 2024, as well as charge sheet dated 10.04.2021 and summoning order dated 21.08.2022, arising out of Case Crime No.23 of 2021, under Sections 147, 148, 308, 323, 324, 325, 452, 504, 506 IPC, Police Station- Mainather, District- Moradabad, pending before the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge, court no. 03, Moradabad. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the parties have entered into compromise on intervention of some respectable persons and well wisher of the parties the terms thereof are reduced to writing in form of compromise on 26.06.2025. On the request of learned court for the parties, this court was pleased to refer the compromise to court below vide order dated 18.08.2025 and parties were directed to file a compromise verification before the court below, and court below was directed to accept the compromise in presence of both the parties. The compromise report has been submitted by the court concerned bearing date 08.09.2025. Copy of compromise alongwith proceedings of trial court taken has been filed before this Court in compliance of earlier order. 5. Certified copy of the compromise and verification order has also been filed today. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ajai Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Kanchan, Shreya Shukla Uvaish And 9 Others .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) 6. Learned A.G.A. has fairly conceded that compromise has been effected between the parties and the same has duly been verified by the court below. 7. Considering the submissions of learned counsel for the parties in light of judgment of Hon'ble Apex Court in catena of decisions has held that inherent power can be used to do real and substantial justice as has been held in Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab [2012, 10 SCC 303], Narindra Singh and others vs. State of Punjab, (2014) 6 SCC 466, Parbatbhai Aahir vs. State of Gujarat, (2017) 9 SCC 641 and State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Laxmi Narayan, (2019) 5 SCC 688, Ram Gopal Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh 14 (SCC) 531 and Madhavrao Jiwaji Rao Scindia & Anr. vs Sambhajirao Chandraojirao Angre 1981 (1) SCC 692. Hence, inherent power can be exercised to speed up the process of ending the criminal proceedings where the settlement is arrived at between the parties. 8. In view of the aforesaid facts and considering that the parties do not wish to pursue the case any further, the dispute is essentially of a private nature and has no wider social impact. Since it has been mutually settled between the parties by way of a compromise, no useful purpose would be served by proceeding with the matter further. 9. For the discussions made above, the present application is allowed and consequently, the entire proceedings of the aforesaid criminal case are hereby quashed. 10. Let a copy of this order be sent to the court concerned for necessary compliance. September 24, 2025 Anjali NA528 No. 26446 of 2025 2 (Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANJALI SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad