Serial No.8 REGULAR CAUSE LIST HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR LPA 108/2022 In OWP 929/2017 Fazal ud Din …Petitioner(s) Through: None Vs. Union Territory of J&K &Ors. ...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Mir Umer, Advocate Ms. Shaila Shameem, Advocate vice Mr. Alla-ud-din Ganai, AAG CORAM: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Kumar, Judge. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Parihar, Judge. ORDER 11.07.2025 01. We have gone through the judgment passed by the writ Court as well as the other material on record, we are of the considered opinion that the judgment passed by the writ Court is perfectly legal and does not call for any interference. 02. The dispute between the appellant and the private respondents is purely a private dispute with regard to which the appellant has already approached the civil Court by way of a civil suit. 03. The compliance report filed by the Deputy Commissioner in response to the order dated 26th September, 2022, reveals that no land of the appellant is being acquired or taken possession of by the official MIR ARIF MANZOOR I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document 11.07.25 respondents, so as to require initiation of any proceedings under the Land Acqusition Act. It seems that appellant being aware of the fate of this appeal has not turned up to appear and argue the mater. 04. Dismissed for want of prosecution. (Sanjay Parihar) (Sanjeev Kumar) Judge Judge SRINAGAR: 11.07.2025 “Mir Arif” MIR ARIF MANZOOR I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document 11.07.25