VIRENDRA KUMAR SABHARWAL v. REGIONAL EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND AND ANOTHER
WRIA/11529/2025 · 2025-08-11
Saurabh Shyam Shamshery
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 78279 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 78279 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:136383 Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 11529 of 2025 Petitioner :- Virendra Kumar Sabharwal Respondent :- Regional Employees Provident Fund And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Jamal Ahmad Khan Counsel for Respondent :- Jagdish Pathak,Rahul Agarwal Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.
1. Heard Jamal Ahmad Khan, learned counsel for petitioner, Sri Jagdish Pathak, Advocate for Respondent-1 and Ms. Akashi Agrawal, Advocate holding brief of Sri Rahul Agrawal, Advocate for Respondent-2.
2. Learned counsel for petitioner, at the outset, submits that at this stage only prayer no. II be considered, which is reproduced hereinafter:
“II. to issue writ, order or direction in the nature and mandamus commanding the respondent no 2 to correct the personal detail and particulars of the petitioner on the official website of the respondent no 1 Provident Fund Organization during the pendency of the present petition before this Hon’ble Court.”
3. Learned counsel appearing for Respondent-UPSRTC submits that aforesaid prayer of petitioner will be considered and in case of any legal impediment, the same will be communicated to him within a short period.
4. At this stage, learned counsel for petitioner submits that on basis of assurance given by learned counsel for respondents this writ petition may be disposed of.
5. In aforesaid circumstances, without entering into merit of case, at this stage, the writ petition is disposed of on basis of assurance given by learned counsel for Respondent-UPSRTC. Order Date :- 12.8.2025 AK Digitally signed by :- AWADESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad