HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 26305 of 2025 Court No. - 67 HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J. 1. List has been revised. 2. Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record. 3. Heard Sri Mahendra Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Sunil Kumar, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on record. 4. Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No. 07 of 2024, under Sections 318(4), 319(2), 61(2) BNS and Section 66, 68D I.T. Act, Police Station- Kannauj, District-Kannauj, during the pendency of trial. 5. Learned counsel for the applicant has stated that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. The applicant has nothing to do with the said offence. The name of the applicant has come up in the confessional statement of the co-accused person which has no evidentiary value in the eyes of law. It is further argued that not a single penny has been transferred to the account of the applicant. Criminal history of one case stands explained. The applicant is languishing in jail since 07.06.2024 and he is ready to cooperate with trial. In case, the applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail. 6. Learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the bail application. 7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the evidence on record and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, prima facie, the Court is of Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Mahendra Kumar Yadav, Vinod Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Hazrat Ansari .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed. 8. Let the applicant-Hazrat Ansari, who is involved in aforementioned case crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. Further, before issuing the release order, the sureties be verified. (i) The applicant shall not tamper with evidence during trial. (ii) The applicant shall not pressurise/intimidate with the prosecution witnesses. (iii) The applicant shall appear before the trial court on the date fixed. 9. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. 10. It is made clear that observations made in granting bail to the applicant shall not in any way affect the learned trial Judge in forming his independent opinion based on the testimony of the witnesses. September 19, 2025 Karan BAIL No. 26305 of 2025 2 (Krishan Pahal,J.) Digitally signed by :- KARAN KUMAR RAO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad