IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.2032 of 2025 ------ 1. Manoj Kumar Gupta @ Manoj Saw aged about 31 years, of Saryu Saw, 2. Prakash Sao, aged about 38 years son of Saryu Saw, 3. Ramchandra Gupta @ Ramchandra Saw, aged about 24 years, son of Saryu Saw, 4. Vikash Kumar Gupta @ Vikash Gupta, aged about 25 years, son of Basudev Saw, 5. Santosh Kumar @ Santosh Saw, aged about 35 years, son of Basudev Saw All are residents of village- Phulwariya, P.O. & P.S.- Nawalsahi, District- Koderma. .... .... …. Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : Ms. Pinki Kumari, Advocate For the State : Mr. Jitendra Pandey, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated-27-03-2025 Heard the parties. Apprehending their arrest in connection with Nawal Shahi P.S. Case No.18 of 2024 instituted under Sections 341/323/324/325/307/34 of the Indian Penal Code, the petitioners have moved this Court for grant of privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons, attempted to murder Bahadur Sao and caused grievous injury to him. It is next submitted that the allegations against the petitioners are all false and are general and omnibus in nature. It is then submitted that the specific allegation of assault is upon Sonu Kumar Sao, who is not the petitioner in this case. It is then submitted that the assault is on the legs of the victim which is not a vital part of the body. It is further submitted that the petitioners undertake to co-operate with the investigation of the case and also undertake to furnish sufficient security including cash security and also undertake not to annoy or disturb the informant, victim or any of their family members in any manner during pendency of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioners be given the privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned Addl.P.P appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners. Considering the submissions of learned counsels and the facts and circumstances stated above, I am inclined to grant privileges of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to surrender in the Court below within six weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrendering, they will be enlarged on bail on depositing Rs.20,000/- each as cash security and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Koderma in connection with Nawal Shahi P.S. Case No.18 of 2024 with the condition that they will co-operate with the investigation of the case and appear before the investigating officer as and when noticed by him and furnish their mobile numbers and photocopy of the Aadhar Cards with an undertaking that they will not change their mobile numbers during the pendency of the case and they will not to annoy or disturb the informant, victim or any of their family members in any manner during pendency of the case and further conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Saroj/