NETTEL INFRASTUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 2 OTHERS
WRIC/1228/2025 · 2025-02-26
Shekhar B Saraf, Vipin Chandra Dixit
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7826 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7826 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:28067-DB
Court No. - 40 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 1228 of 2025 Petitioner :- Nettel Infrastucture Private Limited Respondent :- State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Santosh Kumar Giri Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Shekhar B. Saraf,J. Hon'ble Vipin Chandra Dixit,J. Impleadment Application
1. This impleadment application has been filed in Court today seeking impleadment of 'DCP, B-116, B Block, Sector 6, Noida, Uttar Pradesh' as respondent No.4 in the writ petition.
2. Upon considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the application is allowed. Let 'DCP, B-116, B Block, Sector 6, Noida, Uttar Pradesh' be impleaded as respondent No.4 in the writ petition. Writ Petition
3. Heard counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.
4. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the respondent authorities in providing police assistance to the petitioner company for installing ground based monopole.
5. Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents submits that for the grievance raised in the writ petition, the appropriate remedy for the petitioner is to approach the respondent No.2, being the Police Commissioner, Commissionerate, Gautam Budh Nagar.
6. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of giving liberty to the petitioner to approach the respondent No.2 for redressal of his grievance. In the event, the petitioner approaches the respondent No.2 within a period of two weeks from date, the respondent No.2
shall consider and decide the representation of the petitioner within a period of ten weeks from the date of receipt of representation. An opportunity of hearing should also be granted to the petitioner and the respondent No.4 before passing a reasoned order.
8. With these directions, the writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 27.2.2025 Rakesh (Vipin Chandra Dixit, J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf, J.) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH MEHTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad