Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 78259 (KAR)

SRI NAGESHA S R v. SRI MAHIMANNA

MFA/5001/2020 · 2025-09-13

Lok Adalath

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BENGALURU BEFORE THE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2025 CONCILIATOR PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K & SMT. NALINA K, MEMBER M.F.A.No.5001/2020 (MV-D) (Lok Adalat No.5937/2025) BETWEEN 1 . SRI NAGESHA S.R S/O LATE RAJANNA AND LATE GANGAMMA AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS 2 . SRI. YOGESH S.R S/O LATE RAJANNA AND LATE GANGAMMA AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS BOTH ARE RESIDENT OF SHIVAGANGE SOMPURA HOBLI NELAMANGALA TALUK BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT. ...APPELLANTS (BY SRI. SATHISHA T, ADVOCATE) AND 1 . SRI MAHIMANNA S/O LATE KARIYANNA AGED WAS IN MAJOR R/O KENGAL KEMPOHALLI SOMPURA HOBLI NELAMANGALAM TALUK BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-562 123. 2 . THE MANAGER M/S. RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPASNY LTD., S.M TOWERS, II FLOOR 2 11TH MAIN, 3RD BLOCK JAYANAGARA BENGALURU-56000. NOW REPRESENTED BY THE MANAGER RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD., REGIONAL OFFICE EAST WING NO.28 CENTENARY BUILDING M.G. ROAD BENGALURU-560 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. H.C BETSUR, ADVOCATE) THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 05.07.2018 PASSED IN MVC NO. 650/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE PRESIDING OFFICER, MACT AND SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, NELAMANGALA, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED: CONCILIATION ORDER The learned counsel appearing for the appellants/claimants is present. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent/Insurance Company along with its representative are present. 2. Though the matter was not listed either in settled list or fresh matters, since both the parties and their respective counsel 3 are intended to settle their dispute amicably, the matter is taken up for conciliation. 3. After prolonged negotiations, the matter is settled. A joint memo signed by the learned counsel appearing for the appellants/claimants (being authorized by the appellants/claimants to sign) and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent/Insurance Company and its authorized officer is filed. The appellants/claimants have agreed to receive and the respondent/Insurance Company has agreed to pay a lump-sum of Rs.7,00,000/- (Rupees Seven Lakhs only), in addition to what has been awarded by the Tribunal, in full and final settlement of the claim. 4. The respondent/Insurance Company has agreed to deposit the said amount before the Tribunal within six weeks from the date of preparation of award, failing which, the said amount shall carry interest at the rate of 9% per annum from the date of default, till the date of deposit. 5. The apportionment, deposit and release of the enhanced compensation amount shall be made in terms of the Judgment and Award passed by the Claims Tribunal. 4 6. This Miscellaneous First Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the Joint memo. The Judgment and Award of the Tribunal shall stand modified accordingly. Draw up the Award accordingly. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- MEMBER CR