Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 78239 (ALL)

RAJENDRA SINGH v. RAMSNEHI AND 3 OTHERS

A227/7733/2025 · 2025-07-24

Manish Kumar Nigam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:122269 Court No. - 9 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7733 of 2025 Petitioner :- Rajendra Singh Respondent :- Ramsnehi And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Chandrakant Tripathi Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief: " यह कक ममनननय नयमयमलय ममलवमद ससखयम 273 वरर 2024 रमजजनद सससह बनमम रमम सनजहन आकद मम पसततत सथगन आवजदनपत 6C2 कदनमसककत 12.09.2024, जज नयमयमलय कदतनय ससकवल जज (जमकनयर कडवनजन), कमसगसज कज समक लममबत हह, कम कनसतमरण तवररतगकत सज शनघमकतशनघ ( कनयत / कनरमरररत अवसर कज भनतर) करनज हजतत अरननसथ नयमयमलय कज आदजकशत / कनदरकशत करनज कक महतन कक पम करम।" 3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that an application for interim injunction (6C Application) is pending since 2024 and the same has not been decided despite several dates have been fixed. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously. 4. In view of above, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending. 5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the 2nd Civil Judge (J.D.) Kasganj to consider and decide the interim injunction application (6C Application), in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the concerned parties as well as giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. Order Date :- 25.7.2025 Ved Prakash (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad