Page 1 of 3. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.9010 of 2025 Tara Prasad Hotta ..... Petitioner(s) Mr. Kailash Chandra Satapathy, Advocate -versus- Recovery Officer and Deputy General Manager, Securities and Exchange Board of India, West Bengal Opposite Parties Mr. Tapesh Roy, Advocate CORAM: THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SANJEEB K PANIGRAHI ORDER 03.12.2025 Order No. 03. 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid arrangement. 2. The Petitioner, by filing this Writ Petition, has invoked the jurisdiction of this Court under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction from this Court to the Opposite Party to defreeze the bank accounts i.e. State Bank of India, Account No.31694559127, IFSC Code NO.SB1N0012026, State Bank of India, Account No.30416561790, IFSC Code No.SBlN0007045, HDFC Bank Account No.50200040254914, IFSC Code No.HDFC0001080 and Bank of India Account Digitally Signed Signed by: GITANJALI NAYAK Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK Date: 03-Dec-2025 18:04:21 Signature Not Verified Page 2 of 3. No.512910110000133, IFSC Code No.BKID0005564 under Annexure-3. 3. In course of hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioner without touching upon the merit of the case/claim of the Petitioner, inviting attention of this Court to Annexure-3 submits that the Petitioner having made representation before the Opposite Party for redressal of his grievance, is still pending for consideration and no information has been provided to the Petitioner as to the action taken there upon. He, therefore, limits the prayer for disposal of this Writ Petition with a direction to the Opposite Party for consideration of the representation of the Petitioner and its disposal in accordance with law within a time frame. 4. Considering the submissions made and on going through the averments taken in the Writ Petition as well as the documents annexed; further keeping in view the limited nature of prayer as is now advanced without expressing any opinion on the merit of the claim/case of the Petitioner, this Writ Petition stands disposed of with the observation that if the representation of the Petitioner under Annexure-3 is still pending with the Opposite Party, the same shall be considered on its own merit and disposed Digitally Signed Signed by: GITANJALI NAYAK Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK Date: 03-Dec-2025 18:04:21 Page 3 of 3. of in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of one (01) month from the date of presentation of an authenticated copy of this order. It is further made clear that the result of the same be informed to the Petitioner. 5. The Writ Petition is, accordingly, disposed of. (Dr. Sanjeeb K. Panigrahi) Judge Gitanjali