Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 78218 (BOM)

AVANCE TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED THROUGH KUNAL R. PARMAR v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

ALP/267/2022 · 2025-11-19

Shri Sandeep V Marne

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

k 1/2 2 alp 266.22 alp 267.22 as cri.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL (PVT.) NO.266 OF 2022 Advance Technologies Limited ....Applicant V/S The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ....Respondents WITH APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL (PVT.) NO.267 OF 2022 Advance Technologies Limited ....Applicant V/S The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ....Respondents _________ Mr. Arunesh S. Mishra for the Applicant. Mr. Vinit A. Kjlkarni, APP for Respondent No.1/State. __________ CORAM : SANDEEP V. MARNE, J. DATE : 19 NOVEMBER 2025. P.C.: 1. The learned counsel appearing for the Applicant/Appellant, on instructions, seeks leave of the Court to withdraw the Applications and the Appeals with liberty to file Appeal under the Proviso to Section 372 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973/Section 413 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 before the Sessions Court in view of judgment of the Apex Court in Celestium Financial vs. A. Gnanasekaran Etc.1. 2. Reserving the liberty as prayed for, the Applications and Appeals are permitted to be withdrawn and disposed of. 1 2025 SCC OnLine SC 1320 katkam Page No. 1 of 2 k 2/2 2 alp 266.22 alp 267.22 as cri.doc 3. If Appeals are filed before the Sessions Court within a period of eight weeks, the Appellant/Applicant shall be entitled to the benefit of Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963. (SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.) katkam Page No. 2 of 2 SUDARSHAN RAJALINGAM KATKAM Digitally signed by SUDARSHAN RAJALINGAM KATKAM Date: 2025.11.20 10:53:50 +0530