Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 78200 (BOM)

SAHADU CHINDU WAJE v. POPAT VISHNU WAJE AND ORS.

WP/4241/2018 · 2025-11-27

Gauri Godse

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

28-WP-4241-2018.docx IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4241 OF 2018 Sahadu Chindu Waje … Petitioner Vs. Popat Vishnu Waje and Others … Respondents Mr. Pratap Patil for the Petitioner. Mr. Tappan Thathe for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2. CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J. DATE : 27th NOVEMBER 2025 ORDER : 1. This petition is filed to challenge dismissal of the revision application filed by the petitioner in Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal (“MRT”) to challenge the order passed for granting permission under Section 43 of The Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 (“the said Act”). 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner on instructions seeks leave to withdraw this petition with liberty to adopt appropriate proceedings to challenge the order passed under Section 32G and the certificate issued under Section 32M of the said Act in favour of respondent no. 1. 1/2 rrpillai RAJESHWARI RAMESH PILLAI Digitally signed by RAJESHWARI RAMESH PILLAI Date: 2025.11.28 11:09:20 +0530 28-WP-4241-2018.docx 3. Leave granted with liberty as prayed. 4. It is clarified that if the proposed proceedings are filed within a period of six weeks from today, the petitioner would be entitled to seek benefit of the period of pendency of this petition for seeking condonation of delay in adopting the proposed proceeding. 5. It is further clarified that this court has not examined the merits of the impugned order. Hence, all rival contention on merits are kept open. 6. The Writ Petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as recorded above. [GAURI GODSE, J.] 2/2