[2025:RJ-JP:8254] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2557/2025 Sunil Kumar S/o Somaram, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Daaro Ki Dhaani, Saakad, Police Station Sanchore, District Jalore, Currently Senior Teacher At Government Higher Secondary School, Maithariwada, Police Station Raniwara, District Jalore. (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anoop Pareek Mr. Pranav Pareek For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sudesh Kumar Saini, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 24/02/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.58/2024 registered at Special Police Station (SOG), District ATS & SOG for the offences punishable under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 & 120B of IPC and Sections 3, 4, 6, 7 & 10 of Rajasthan Public Examination (Measures for Prevention of Unfair Means In Recruitment) Act, 2022. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is submitted that petitioner has been made accused in this case on the basis of the fact that petitioner and co-accused namely- Ashok [2025:RJ-JP:8254] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-2557/2025] Kumar knew each other. As per prosecution case, a dummy candidate appeared on behalf of co-accused namely- Ashok Kumar in examination of PTI and in result, he was declared successful. It is submitted that in identical circumstances, bail has been granted to other co-accused persons by Co-ordinate bench of this Court in S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.11789/2024. It is submitted that co-accused Ashok Kumar has also been granted benefit of bail by this Court vide order dated 20.12.2024. There are no criminal antecedents against the petitioner and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion. Petitioner is in custody since 29.01.2025 and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by the counsel for the petitioner. He submits that there is serious allegation against the petitioner as such type of offences are increasing. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, so also considering the fact that co- accused Ashok Kumar has been granted benefit of bail by this Court; petitioner has no criminal antecedents as well as looking to the custody period, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner Sunil Kumar S/o Somaram, shall be [2025:RJ-JP:8254] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-2557/2025] released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall mark his presence once in every three months in the concerned police station. 8. Concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register recording the attendance of the petitioner. In case the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned police station, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this regard. 9. If breach of any of these conditions is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial court to cancel the bail granted to him by this Court. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /24