Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7820 (AP)

BANDI TIRUMALANATH v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/4411/2025 · 2025-02-20

Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010081662025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] THURSDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 4411/2025 Between: 1. BANDI TIRUMALANATH, S/O SUBBAYYA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/O KOMAROLU VILLAGE MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KOMAROLU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, OFFICE OF TAHSILDAR, KOMAROLU VILLAGE MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. PAVAN KUMAR ANNABATHUNI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: 2 ORAL ORDER: Sri A.S.K.S. Bhargav, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri A. Pavan Kumar, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner and Sri K. Arjun Chowdary, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue. 2. Learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner has drawn the attention of this Court to the F-line Application submitted by the Writ Petitioner dated 16.10.2025 (Ex.P.1). 3. Sri K. Arjun Chowdhary, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, has submitted the Written Instructions furnished by the Tahsildar of Komarole Mandal, Prakasam District, dated 17.02.2025, along with a copy of the Revenue Record as well as the Rejection Order. Copies of the same are supplied to the Counsel for the Writ Petitioner and the same are taken on record. 4. Learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner submits that the Writ Petitioner is unaware of the passing of the Rejection Order. He would seek to withdraw this Writ Petition with liberty to avail the other remedies as available to him under law. 5. Request granted. 6. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the Writ Petitioner to avail the other remedies as available to him under law. No order as to costs. 7. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENIRAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 20.02.2025 DSV