Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 78194 (KAR)

SMT MAYURI v. SMT CHITRA K

RFA/270/2024 · 2025-09-18

Anu Sivaraman, Rajesh Rai K

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:39404-DB RFA No. 270 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 270 OF 2024 (PAR) BETWEEN: SMT. MAYURI AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS W/O SRI MURALI M RESIDING AT F/O P V R BABU OLD NO 236, NEW NO.08 4th STREET, TAMIL NADU HOUSING BOARD, KORATTUR, CHENNAI TAMILNADU. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. H MAREGOWDA, ADVOCATE- (ABSENT)) AND: 1. SMT. CHITRA K. D/O. LATE M.KALAIAH @ KALAPPA AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS R/O NO.343, 1ST FLOOR, MAHALINGESHWARA BADAVANE ADUGODI POST BENGALURU - 560 030. 2. SRI SARAVANA Digitally signed by CHANNEGOWDA PREMA Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:39404-DB RFA No. 270 of 2024 S/O. LATE M. KALAIAH @ KALAPPA AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS R/O NO.343, 1ST FLOOR MAHALINGESHWARA BADAVANE ADUGODI POST BENGALURU - 560030 3. SMT. VANITHA K., D/O LATE M. KALAIAH @ KALAPPA W/O. JOHN INABAKUMAR AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS R/O. AMBEDKAR STREET NEMILICHERRY POST THIRUNINRAVOOR POST TIRUVALLUR DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH. 4. SMT. DEVU SHRI K., D/O. LATE M. KALAIAH @ KALAPPA W/O. SRI RAJESGM AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS R/O. KALLAGURI VILLAGE AND POST KRISHNAGIRI DISTRICT TAMILNADU. …RESPONDENTS THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SEC.96 R/W ORDER 41 RULE 1 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 17.06.2014 PASSED IN OS NO.741/2012 ON THE FILE OF I ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT, BANGALORE, DECREEING THE SUIT FOR PARTITION AND SEPARATE POSSESSION. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:39404-DB RFA No. 270 of 2024 THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K) There is no appearance for the appellant. 2. Till today, office objections are not complied. Therefore, in view of the peremptory order dated 12.09.2024 passed by this Court, no further order is required. 3. Accordingly, appeal stands dismissed for non- prosecution. Sd/- (ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE Sd/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE PN List No.: 4 Sl No.: 18