Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 78187 (KAR)

M/S BMR DAIRY FOODS v. M/S STRATEGIC MARKETING AND RESEARCH TEAM

CRP/587/2025 · 2025-09-08

M Nagaprasanna

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35393 CRP No. 587 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 587 OF 2025 BETWEEN: 1. M/S BMR DAIRY FOODS NO.C, 200, 15TH MAIN, HEBBAL INDUSTRIAL AREA, MYSORE -570 016. REP BY ITS PROPRIETOR MRS.MAHALAKSHMI PUTTASWAMY. 2. MRS.MAHALAKSHMI PUTTASWAMY, PROPRIETOR M/S BMR DAIRY FOODS, NO.C, 200, 5TH MAIN HEBBAL INDUSTRIAL AREA, MYSORE -570 016. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. G B NANDISH GOWDA.,ADVOCATE) AND: M/S STRATEGIC MARKETING AND RESEARCH TEAM, REGISTERED PARTNERSHIP FIRM, UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF INDIAN PARTNERSHIP ACT, Digitally signed by NAGAVENI Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35393 CRP No. 587 of 2025 HAVING ITS OFFICE AT NO.253, 5TH BLOCK, 67TH CROSS, RAJAJINAGARA, BENGALURU -560 010. REP BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER/AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY, MR.ANAND KUMAR.K, S/O SRI.K.KRISHNA SWAMY, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS. …RESPONDENT THIS CRP FILED UNDER SEC.115 OF CPC., SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 23.07.2025 PASSED ON IA NO.2 IN COM.OS NO.288/2025 ON THE FILE OF LXXXIV ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU., REJECTING THE IA NO.2 FILED UNDER ORDER VII RULE 11(a) AND (d) OF CPC., FOR REJECTION OF PLAINT. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35393 CRP No. 587 of 2025 ORAL ORDER Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners files a memo seeking withdrawal of the petition. The memo so filed reads as follows: "MEMO FOR WITHDRAWAL The petitioners in the above case pray that this Hon'ble court be pleased to permit him to withdraw the above revision petition as not pressed. Reserving liberty to the petitioners challenge the impugned order before this Hon'ble Court in Writ petition in the interest of justice and equity." 2. In terms of memo, the petition is disposed as withdrawn, reserving liberty to the petitioners to avail of such remedy, as sought for. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE PHM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 374