2025:UHC:5254 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS ABA No. 668 of 2025 Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. Mr. Harendra Belwal and Mr. A.M. Saklani, learned counsel for the applicant. 2. Mr. Deepak Bhardwaj, learned Brief Holder for the State. 3. The present applicant’ Sarabjit Singh’ S/o Hardeep Singh is praying for anticipatory bail in relation to First Information Report dated 26.07.2023 bearing FRI No. 0254 of 2023 P.S. Kankhal, District Haridwar, wherein, the present applicant and one Upendra Singh Madan, the resident of Australia, were implicated for the offences punishable under Sections 420 and 506 of IPC. 4. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated and no amount was credited in his account. He further submits that no such assurance of giving appointment was given to the complainant and absolutely false allegations have been alleged. He submits that with the vague allegations an application was moved under Section 156(3) of Cr.P.C., which was allowed pursuant to which the FIR has been lodged. He further submits that even as per the allegation alleged in the FIR no offence cognizable under Sections 420 and 506 of IPC are made out against the applicant, however, there is an apprehension of arrest and be granted anticipatory bail. 5. On the other side, learned Brief Holder for the State Mr. Deepak Bhardwaj on written instructions submits that notice under Section 41 was issued to the present applicant on 12.03.2025 despite this the applicant has not turned up to join the investigation. 6. Apart from this, a huge amount was also found to be credited in the account of the co- accused, who is in direct touch with the present applicant. 7. After hearing the arguments of learned counsel for the parties and further taking into consideration the allegation alleged in the FIR, this court is of the view that the applicant does not deserve for any protection. 2025:UHC:5254 8. Accordingly, the instant anticipatory bail application is rejected. (Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 23.06.2025 PR