Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7817 (UTT)

VIKAS GARG v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/617/2025 · 2025-09-12

Ashish Naithani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No. Dat e Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS 2025:UHC:8164 WPCRL No.617 of 2025 Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J. Mr. Nikhil Singhal, learned counsel for the Petitioner. 2. Mr. Rakesh Negi, learned Brief Holder, for the State of Uttarakhand. 3. Mr. Shashi Kant Shandilya, learned counsel for the private Respondent. 4. Learned Government Counsel makes a statement on the basis of the counter affidavit so filed, whereby, it is stated that “on 04.11.2024 and after registration of FIR the investigation is being conducted and during the course of investigation no involvement of the present Petitioner – Sri Vikas Garg was found in the present case, therefore, his name was exonerated from the investigation, however, the investigation of the case is going on.” 5. Since the Petitioner – Sri Vikas Garg, has been exonerated from all the alleged charges, the writ petition has become infructuous. 6. The writ petition is dismissed as having infructuous. (Ashish Naithani, J.) 12.09.2025 Nitesh/