Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 78161 (KAR)

SMT. OBALAMMA v. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER

MSA/137/2024 · 2025-11-12

M G Uma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46121 MSA No. 137 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE M G UMA MISCELLANEOUS SECOND APPEAL NO. 137 OF 2024 (LA) BETWEEN: SMT. OBALAMMA W/O THIMMAIAH AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS RESIDING AT BALLAPURA VILLAGE BELLAVIHOBLI, BUGDANAHALLI POST TUMKURU TALUK, BALLAPURA TUMKURU-572 107 …APPELLANT (BY SRI: MANJULA D.,ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: 1. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER HEMAVATHI CANAL ZONE TUMKURU-572 102 2. 3. THE CHIEF ENGINEER HEMAVATHI CANAL ZONE TUMKURU-572 102 S. RANGAPPA DEAD BY LRS R. NAGARAJ S/O S. RANGAPPA AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS Digitally signed by NANDINI B G Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46121 MSA No. 137 of 2024 4. R. NAGAMAINI D/O S. RANGAPPA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS 5. GANGAIAH S/O THIMMAIAH MAJOR 6. RANGASWAMY S/O CHIKKARAGAPPA AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS 7. CHANDRAIAH S/O NAASHIMAIAH AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS PUTTAMMA W/O ADAVEESHAIAH DEAD BY LRs 8. SOMASHEKARAIAH S/O LATE PUTTAMMA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS 9. SEEBINARASIMHAIAH S/O LATE PUTTAMMA AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS 10. KUMARAIAH S/O PUTTAMMA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS NAGESH DEAD BY LRs 11. SHARADAMMA W/O LATE NAGESH @ NAGESHAIAH AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46121 MSA No. 137 of 2024 12. BHARATHI D/O LATE NAGESH @ NAGESHAIAH AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS 13. NINGAPPA S/O CHIKKARAGAIAH AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS ALL ARE R/AT BALLAPURA VILLAGE BELLAVI HOBLI, TUMKUR ALUK TUMKUR DISTRICT-572 107 …RESPONDENTS THIS MSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.54(2) OF LAND ACQUISITION ACT., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 24.04.2018 PASSED IN RA NO.203/2017 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, TUMAKURU, PARTLY ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND MODIFYING THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 13.12.2016 PASSED IN LAC.126/1997 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, TUMAKURU, ALLOWING THE REFERENCE PETITION FILED UNDER SEC.18(1) OF THE LAND ACQUISITION ACT. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE M G UMA ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the appellant prays for time to cure the defects. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46121 MSA No. 137 of 2024 2. The appeal is listed for 8th time for compliance of office objections. 3. The order sheet dated 05.11.2025 reads as under: " Learned counsel for the appellant prays for a day's time to cure the defects. The order sheet dated 15.10.2025 reads as under: "Learned Counsel for the appellant prays for time. Office has raised as many as 6 office objections, even the court fee is pending and the same is not complied even though the matter is listed for non-compliance of office objections for sixth time. I do not find any reason to adjourn the matter. However, to afford final opportunity, as a last chance, list this matter on 05.11.2025." Even then, to afford one more opportunity, list this matter on 12.11.2025. By then, learned counsel for the appellant to comply with the office objections." - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46121 MSA No. 137 of 2024 Inspite of that, there is no compliance. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non compliance of office objections. Sd/- (M G UMA) JUDGE BGN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 4