IN THE 226 Chander Kant Sh Deepika and anot CORAM : HON Present: Mr. Mr. Mr. for t Mr. Kr. P for t *** NAMIT KUMA 1. The dated 23.10.201 Gurugram wher maintenance und 2. Lear present petition. 3. Dism February 17, 20 Pankaj* THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB CHANDIGARH CRR(F)- Date of De ant Sharma Versus another HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT Mr. Rakesh Nehra, Senior Advocate Mr. Bindu Tanwar, Advocate Mr. Devesh Nehra, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vishavjeet Singh, Advocate Kr. Prashant Singh Chauhan, Advoc for the respondents. *** UMAR, J. (ORAL) The petitioner has filed the instant re 10.2019 passed by the learned Pr whereby the application preferred ce under Section 125 Cr.P.C. has been earned assisting counsel for the pe ition. Dismissed as withdrawn. , 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable NJAB AND HARYANA AT ARH -2-2021 (O&M) e of Decision:17.02.2025 ... Petitioner ... Respondents AMIT KUMAR vocate with Advocate stant revision petition against the order ed Principal Judge, Family Court eferred by the respondent-wife for s been allowed. the petitioner wishes to withdraw the (NAMIT KUMAR) JUDGE ned : Yes/No : Yes/No s e order Court, fe for aw the PANKAJ KUMAR 2025.02.18 12:20 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court Chandigarh