AMIT KUMAR SHRIVASTAVA S/O LATE SHRI KAMLESH KUMAR SHRIVASTAVA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/2488/2025 · 2025-06-24
Ashutosh Kumar V J
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7815 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7815 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:23452] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2488/2025 Amit Kumar Shrivastava S/o Late Shri Kamlesh Kumar Shrivastava, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Vt Road, Fatehpur, Police Station Fatehpur, District Fatehpur, U.P. The Then Resident Of House No. 48, Near Kali Kothi, Ward No. 10, Near B.S.N.L. Tower, Jhotwada, Police Station Jhotwada, District Jaipur. At Present House No. 21, Ganesh Nagar, 15 Gwaliya Baba Mod, Mansa Rampura, Police Station Kardhani, District Jaipur West (Rajasthan) (At Present In Central Jail, Jaipur). ----Accused/Applicant Versus State of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Applicant : Mr. Prahlad Sharma, Adv. For Respondent : Mr. Rajesh Choudhary, GA-cum-AAG Mr. Amit Kumar Gupta, Dy.G.A. Mr. Manvendra Singh, Dy.G.A.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR (V.J.)
Order 24/06/2025
1. The present bail application has been filed by the accused-applicant under Section 483 of the B.N.S.S., 2023 against the order dated 12.02.2025 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge No.5, Jaipur Metropolitan-I, Jaipur in Bail Application No.24/2025 arising out of FIR No.32/2022, registered at Police Station Shipra Path, Jaipur City (South) for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471 & 120-B of IPC by which the bail application of the accused-applicant under Section 483 of B.N.S.S., 2023 has been dismissed.
[2025:RJ-JP:23452] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-2488/2025]
2.
Learned counsel for the accused-applicant submits that the accused-applicant has falsely been implicated in this case.
Learned counsel for the accused-applicant also submits that the transaction of purchasing the plot by the complainant was with one Satya Prakash, who is the co-accused in this case and not with the present accused-applicant. Learned counsel further submits that the present accused-applicant has not entered into any agreement with the complainant; neither he has received any money from the complainant nor he has forged any document.
3.
Learned counsel for the accused-applicant contends that the charge-sheet has already been filed against the accused-applicant for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B of IPC and the same are triable by Magistrate and trial will take long time to conclude. Learned counsel also contends that the accused-applicant was arrested on 16.01.2025 and since then, he is behind the bars, therefore, the accused- applicant be enlarged on bail.
4. Learned Government Advocate-cum-Additional Advocate General along with learned Deputy Government Advocates vehemently oppose this bail application and submit the FSL Report dated 04.06.2025 with regard to the specimen signature of the accused-applicant. FSL Report dated 04.06.2025 is taken on record.
5. Heard learned counsel for the parties and also perused the material available on record.
6. Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case; the period of custody of the accused-applicant; the charge-sheet
[2025:RJ-JP:23452] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-2488/2025] has already been filed and trial will take long time to conclude and the offences are triable by Magistrate, but without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, this Court deems it proper to allow the bail application filed by the applicant.
7. Consequently, this bail application filed under Section 483 of the B.N.S.S., 2023 is allowed. It is ordered that accused-applicant Amit Kumar Shrivastava S/o Late Shri Kamlesh Kumar Shrivastava, arrested in connection with FIR No.32/2022, registered at Police Station Shipra Path, Jaipur City (South) shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- and two solvent attested sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court. Applicant will be required to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
[ASHUTOSH KUMAR (V.J.)],J AARZOO ARORA/Sudha /15