[2025:RJ-JP:8640] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2810/2025 Dr. Surendra Singh S/o Shri Ranjeet Singh, aged about 34 Years, R/o Village Rewar Ka Bas, Post Ringan Tehsil Ladnu District Didwana-Kuchaman Rajasthan ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan, through Principal Secretary, Department of Medical and Health, Government of Rajasthan, Govt. Secretariat Jaipur Rajasthan 2. Director Public Health and Family Welfare Services, Medical and Health Services Rajasthan Jaipur Rajasthan 3. Chief Medical and Health Officer, Nagaur, Rajasthan 4. Block Chief Medical Officer Kuchaman, District Nagaur 5. Medical Officer In-Charge, Community Health Center, Kukanwali, District Nagaur ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mahendra Sharma For Respondent(s) : JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 27/02/2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that prior to approaching this Court, a detailed comprehensive representation was filed by the petitioner before the respondent-authorities for redressal of his grievances, but, till date, the said representation not been decided by the respondents for the reasons best-known to them. Counsel submits that appropriate directions be issued to the respondents to decide the same, expeditiously, as early as possible, preferably within a time frame. [2025:RJ-JP:8640] (2 of 2) [CW-2810/2025] 2. Heard and considered the submissions. 3. The Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Pawan Kumar Meena vs. The State of Rajasthan & Ors.; S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1665/2024 decided on 0202.2024 has issued a general direction to the administrative departments of the State to decide the representations of the aggrieved persons, expeditiously, as early as possible, by passing a reasoned and speaking order. 4. In pursuance of the directions issued in the case of Pawan Meena (supra), even the department of administration has issued a circular dated 19.02.2024 directing all the departments to do the needful but inspite of above, the representation submitted by the petitioner has not been decided by the respondents. 5. In view of above, the instant writ petition stands disposed of by issuing direction to the respondents to decide the representation of the petitioner, pending, if any, expeditiously, as early as possible, strictly in accordance with law, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. 6. Stay application as well as all pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Garima/73