Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 78100 (BOM)

MANJU VINIT GADGIL AND ANR. v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

WP/5114/2024 · 2025-11-04

Revati Mohite Dere, Shri Sandesh Dadasaheb Patil

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

18-wp5114-24.doc vai IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.5114 OF 2024 Mrs.Manju V. Gadgil & Anr. ...Petitioners V/s. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Respondents Mr.Amey Deshpande for the Petitioners. Mrs.Kranti T. Hiwrale, APP for the Respondent No.1 – State. Mr.Omkar Nagwekar i/b Mrs.Prabha Badadare for the Respondent No.2. Ms.Swarupa Naikwade, PSI, Vishrambagh Police Station, Pune City is present in Court. CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE & SANDESH D. PATIL, JJ. DATE : 4TH NOVEMBER, 2025. P.C. :- 1. Since during the pendency of the aforesaid Petition, chargesheet has been filed, learned counsel for the Petitioners seeks leave to withdraw the Petition with liberty to file a fresh Petition, challenging not only the FIR but also the subsequent 1/2 VASANT ANANDRAO IDHOL Digitally signed by VASANT ANANDRAO IDHOL Date: 2025.11.07 11:24:46 +0530 18-wp5114-24.doc filing of chargesheet and cognizance, if taken. 2. The Petition is accordingly disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed. 3. We make it clear that we have not heard the Petition on merits and as such keep all contentions of all parties on merits open. (SANDESH D. PATIL, J.) (REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.) 2/2